from outline to draft
Once you've formulated a workable plan (with some sort of outline), it's generally just a matter of fleshing out that outline to produce your draft. The beauty of the sentence outline (I know, you may not find it all that beautiful...*sigh*) is that you already have complete sentences. We will use all of the sentences already written (why waste them?), but we need to move from point to point smoothly, so we'll need to add transitions. We need to add the supporting information from our sources (that's the whole point of doing the research). Go through your sources and match quotations from those sources to your outline.
What the heck? Do I have to re-read all of my sources?
Not if you did things correctly. Remember, you photocopied or printed out your sources and annotated them. You only have to look through those sections that you highlighted and read the marginal notes you made explaining where bits of evidence might fit in your overall argument (paper). This part should not take much time as long as your annotations were thorough.
If, for example, your outline notes that you will look at Mac Brazel's eyewitness account, then find comments about that eyewitness account from as many of your sources as you can. You will select the best bits from one or two of the sources. Do the same (wherever possible) for each item on your outline. You are creating a sort of sandwich of outline item / quotation / outline item / quotation or two / outline item / quotation, and so on. For those quoted passages we will want to integrate them using the observation / quotation / explanation pattern mentioned in an earlier lecture. But we're well on the way to a solid draft.
Here's a portion of a rough draft that uses the words from the outline along with some supporting quotations from the sources:
There were glaring inconsistencies in the army's story. Over the decades the army could not keep its story straight. Either new evidence came to light, or they were just inventing plausible excuses to keep the public satisfied. In the late 40's the government reported that a weather balloon with a reflective skin crashed and was mistaken for a UFO by hysterical observers. One official report states, "The newspapers insisting that there was a cover-up at Roswell are just trying create a panic to sell papers. The remains of a test balloon were scattered across the landscape, and an untrained civilian could easily have mistaken this for just about anything, but that is all pure imagination" (Carey 215). The official view, however, does not agree with what several key eyewitnesses reported. Those civilians were not all hysterical or even untrained; by one account, "many were educated, and, in fact, there was both a scientist and an ex-military man among them" (Cameron). More surprising than this inconsistency between government and civilians, however, is that the official view given in 1947 does not agree with what the U.S. State Department printed just ten years later.
Finally, of course, after you complete your draft, there is the process of revision-- editing, formatting, and proofreading--which you need to do before turning in the final version of your essay.
If you would like to see more of a finished paper, to see how sources are integrated, how the student's voice is blended with source evidence, you will find samples in the Resources section of Etudes; just select "Essay Samples."
and here are a few faqs with answers that you may find useful
Q: How much of the paper should be mine, and how much should I take from my sources and document?
A: This is an area not everyone agrees on (which is why it's a frequently-asked question!); I tend to disagree with many of the standard handbooks on this point. They generally suggest about 2/3 of the material should be from your sources (evidence supporting your claims), but I think about 1/2 to 2/3 of the paper should be your voice, your analysis or interpretation with about 1/3 supporting evidence from your sources. Then again, this is an exploratory paper, one which requires you to demonstrate your thinking; if it were an explanatory paper (mainly just general information), then you'd be copying more facts from sources and thinking less.
Q: How many of my sources do I need to use?
A: All of them. All of the items appear on your Works Cited page (and the minimum is four) must be quoted from (and cited) in your paper. You will want to use at least two or three quotations from most of them so that you have enough research material to adequately support your argument and to not rely too heavily on any one source.
Q: How do I know if I need to document something or not?
A: Unfortunately, the answer is not that simple. There's a body of knowledge called common knowledge (Lincoln was president of the United States during the American Civil War, Sacramento is the capital of California). Common knowledge does not need to be documented. Specialized knowledge (that an expert in a field would know, the results of a specific research study that you didn't conduct yourself, another person's interpretation of a movie, any exact wording that you take from another person) must always be documented. There is a grey area that often occurs when you summarize or paraphrase. I try to avoid the grey area by avoiding summary and paraphrase and using direct quotations whenever possible; those must always be documented. And if you are in doubt about a specific item, you can always ask your instructor.
Q: Do I need to include a title page? a folder?
A: Different instructors have different thoughts about this, so always ask your instructor. I do not want to see any title pages; just use the standard MLA format. If you are submitting a hardcopy of your project (rather than e-mailing files), your papers should not be in folders (though your entire project will be in a manila envelope).
Q: There is another format in the book called APA format; is it OK if I use that format?
A: No. Papers written for English classes, the humanities and history and several other disciplines use the MLA (Modern Language Association) format. The APA (American Psychology Association) style is for papers written in the social sciences. The key difference is that APA format emphasizes the date a source was written (important if you are discussing a treatment for ADHD or examining census trends). Your papers for this class must use the MLA format, or they will not be accepted.
Since the MLA format is assigned reading in your handbook (APA format is not), you should not get confused. Do keep your handbook open to the MLA documentation section when you do the documentation for your essay, and you will be fine.
as always,if you have any questions, please ask!